When it comes to Biopics, the underlying
conceit is, because it’s a true story, that makes it matter more. There’s a
genuine atmosphere that comes with them that makes audiences all the more
invested in the narrative. All the work that a piece of fiction has to do to
sell itself to an audience is pretty much cut in half with a biopic, since the
world we’re seeing is the world we’re in. However, this automatic authenticity
might be good for creating tension, but sometimes, it’s a bit disconcerting to
know that the things that are happening on screen that seem larger than life,
actually happened.
That perfectly describes the discomfort I
had watching ‘The Big Short’. Based on the true story of the financial crisis
of 2008, ‘The Big Short’ chronicles not just what happened, but follows the
lives of a few good men who had the fortune to realize what was happening when
it was already too late to stop it. So what did these men do when they were
gifted with the knowledge of the oncoming economic turmoil? They took
everything they had and made a bet against the then undefeated housing market,
and thus “shorted” the US economy.
Cue the "So that's why they called it that."
You might think it’s impossible to root for
anyone who would seek to profit off of the misery of millions, and usually you’d
be right, but not this time. Instead, ‘The Big Short’ does the brilliant thing
of not trying to rationalize the decision, but simply shows it as it was. There
never comes a point where the characters are presented as anything other than
what they are, which is, simply put, opportunists. With that kind of clear cut
honesty, the characters in a way become respectable, which is a point the movie
itself makes. Either that or I’m just the worst and you’re a way better person than
I am.
I didn't
The
honesty in which the character motivations are presented can also be found with
the details of the film. Typically, I expect that biopics or “true stories”
take some liberty with the details just for the sake of telling a more cohesive
narrative that works for a film adaptation. ‘The Big Short’ is probably the
only film that I felt like I could take everything that happened as gospel.
This is because when ‘The Big Short’ IS taking liberty with the truth, it lets
you know. Characters will turn to the camera and say “Okay so what really
happened was-”. On the flip side, when something seems too perfect to be true,
a character will go “No really, that happened.”and since these characters have
been presented so honestly, you can’t help but take their word for it. It makes
any scene where that 4th wall clarification doesn’t happen feel like you can set your
skeptic senses to 0.
I have to mention that this movie makes
Christian Bale, the man who played Batman, seem like the most socially inept
man on the planet. He plays Michael Burry, the man who actually uncovered the
information that lit the fuse that was this movie’s narrative, but whose most
fascinating aspect comes not from what he did, but rather, who he was. Typically,
a movie like this wouldn’t give too much of a damn about what makes these characters
tick. It would be perfectly acceptable for these characters to be their
professions and nothing else. The movie would do just as good a job with
telling the story of what happened. Instead, the movie tells you a little bit
about these men, which makes the story all that more engaging.
The other characters in the film are all
played fantastically by their actors. Steve Carrell actually has the best role
in the film as the hyper angry financier who stopped believing in the system
long before there was any evidence to suggest so. Ryan Gosling is the other
major character in the film who is pretty much the id of the movie, being a
character so transparently sleazy it’s respectable. Even the actors on screen
for a single scene like Melissa Leo and Karen Gillian make an impression, but
not in the way in which names that big can distract from a narrative, but in a
way that actors that big can make a movie feel lived in.
The actors make the movie rather than distract from it.
When it comes to the actually telling of
the story, the movie takes a page from the movie ‘Moneyball’. Just like that
movie, ‘The Big Short’ has a dictionary full of financial jargon that sounds
like gibberish to Joe Q. Popcorn, but for me, even though I didn’t understand
most of what was said, I got the general gist of the stakes. It’s not the easiest
thing to follow, but once you do, the movie moves at such an energetic pace
that you can’t help but feel the sense of urgency the film is trying to
portray.
Director Adam Mckay is known for his
comedic background and for a movie about the financial meltdown that led to a
spike in unemployment and homelessness, it’s freaking funny man. In a way, that’s
not as far fetched as it sounds. Comedy = Tragedy + Time and the absurdity of
the story of a bunch of guys making money off the failure of a system that was
never in a million years supposed to fail, sounds like a joke. That being said,
there are moments when the characters are faced with the reality of what
happens if their bet is successful, and Mckay is successful in balancing these
more heartfelt moments.
Yeah, the guy who made 'Step Brothers'
‘The Big Short’ simply put is a con movie
that doesn’t try to pull the wool over your eyes. I can see this movie
garnering comparisons to ‘Wolf of Wall Street’, with the tone and the subject
matter being so similar, but what ‘The Big Short’does better, is gave me a
story I feel like I needed to hear. It never tries to shy away from the
seriousness of the thing that happened, yet somehow maintains its sense of
comedy. This movie never tries to dumb anything down to you, the dialogue alone
makes that clear. It treated me like an adult but never stopped feeling like a
really cool movie.
A.N.R = 9.4/10
Thanks for reading and if you'd like to tell me what you thought of the movie you can leave a comment below. Also I have a podcast called Take 4, with new episodes every Sunday. Here's an episode we did on biopics:
0 comments:
Post a Comment